Necroptosis blockade prevents lung injury in severe influenza.

Severe influenza A virus (IAV) infections can result in hyper-inflammation, lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome1-5 (ARDS), for which there are no effective pharmacological therapies. Necroptosis is an attractive entry point for therapeutic intervention in ARDS and related inflammatory conditions because it drives pathogenic lung inflammation and lethality during severe IAV infection6-8 and can potentially be targeted by receptor interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) inhibitors. Here we show that a newly developed RIPK3 inhibitor, UH15-38, potently and selectively blocked IAV-triggered necroptosis in alveolar epithelial cells in vivo. UH15-38 ameliorated lung inflammation and prevented mortality following infection with laboratory-adapted and pandemic strains of IAV, without compromising antiviral adaptive immune responses or impeding viral clearance. UH15-38 displayed robust therapeutic efficacy even when administered late in the course of infection, suggesting that RIPK3 blockade may provide clinical benefit in patients with IAV-driven ARDS and other hyper-inflammatory pathologies.

Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof of concept study of LSALT peptide as prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).

OBJECTIVE: Dipeptidase-1 (DPEP-1) is a recently discovered leucocyte adhesion receptor for neutrophils and monocytes in the lungs and kidneys and serves as a potential therapeutic target to attenuate inflammation in moderate-to-severe COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DPEP-1 inhibitor, LSALT peptide, to prevent specific organ dysfunction in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. DESIGN: Phase 2a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, trial. SETTING: Hospitals in Canada, Turkey and the USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 subjects with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation to LSALT peptide 5 mg intravenously daily or placebo for up to 14 days. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects alive and free of respiratory failure and/or the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Numerous secondary and exploratory endpoints were assessed including ventilation-free days, and changes in kidney function or serum biomarkers. RESULTS: At 28 days, 27 (90.3%) and 28 (93.3%) of subjects in the placebo and LSALT groups were free of respiratory failure and the need for RRT (p=0.86). On days 14 and 28, the number of patients still requiring more intensive respiratory support (O2 ≥6 L/minute, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) was 6 (19.4%) and 3 (9.7%) in the placebo group versus 2 (6.7%) and 2 (6.7%) in the LSALT group, respectively (p=0.14; p=0.67). Unadjusted analysis of ventilation-free days demonstrated 22.8 days for the LSALT group compared with 20.9 in the placebo group (p=0.4). LSALT-treated subjects had a significant reduction in the fold expression from baseline to end of treatment of serum CXCL10 compared with placebo (p=0.02). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In a Phase 2 study, LSALT peptide was demonstrated to be safe and tolerated in patients hospitalised with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04402957.

Vaccination protects against acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the occurrence of ARDS in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The study population of this retrospective, single-center cohort study consisted of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with known vaccination status and chest computed tomography imaging between July 2021 and February 2022. The impact of vaccination on ARDS in COVID-19 patients was assessed through logistic regression adjusting for demographic differences and confounding factors with statistical differences determined using confidence intervals and effect sizes. A total of 167 patients (69% male, average age 58 years, 95% CI [55; 60], 42% fully vaccinated) were included in the data analysis. Vaccinated COVID-19 patients had a reduced relative risk (RR) of developing ARDS (RR: 0.40, 95% CI [0.21; 0.62]). Consequently, non-vaccinated hospitalized patients had a 2.5-fold higher probability of developing ARDS. This risk reduction persisted after adjusting for several confounding variables (RR: 0.64, 95% CI [0.29; 0.94]) in multivariate analysis. The protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination increased with ARDS severity (RR: 0.61, 95% CI [0.37; 0.92]). Particularly, patients under 60 years old were at risk for ARDS onset and seemed to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination (RR: 0.51, 95% CI [0.20; 0.90]). COVID-19 vaccination showed to reduce the risk of ARDS occurrence in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with a particularly strong effect in patients under 60 years old and those with more severe ARDS.

Dimethyl malonate protects the lung in a murine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Succinate is a proinflammatory citric acid cycle metabolite that accumulates in tissues during pathophysiological states. Oxidation of succinate after ischemia-reperfusion leads to reversal of the electron transport chain and generation of reactive oxygen species. Dimethyl malonate (DMM) is a competitive inhibitor of succinate dehydrogenase, which has been shown to reduce succinate accumulation. We hypothesized that DMM would protect against inflammation in a murine model of ARDS. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were given ARDS via 67.7 µg of intratracheally administered lipopolysaccharide. Dimethyl malonate (50 mg/kg) was administered via tail vein injection 30 minutes after injury, then daily for 3 days. The animals were sacrificed on day 4 after bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Bronchoalveolar lavage cell counts were performed to examine cellular influx. Supernatant protein was quantified via Bradford protein assay. Animals receiving DMM (n = 8) were compared with those receiving sham injection (n = 8). Cells were fixed and stained with FITC-labeled wheat germ agglutinin to quantify the endothelial glycocalyx (EGX). RESULTS: Total cell counts in BAL was less for animals receiving DMM (6.93 × 10 6 vs. 2.46 × 10 6 , p = 0.04). The DMM group had less BAL macrophages (168.6 vs. 85.1, p = 0.04) and lymphocytes (527.7 vs. 248.3; p = 0.04). Dimethyl malonate-treated animals had less protein leak in BAL than sham treated (1.48 vs. 1.15 µg/µl, p = 0.03). Treatment with DMM resulted in greater staining intensity of the EGX in the lung when compared with sham (12,016 vs. 15,186 arbitrary units, p = 0.03). Untreated animals had a greater degree of weight loss than treated animals (3.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.04). Dimethyl malonate prevented the upregulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (1.66 vs. 0.92 RE, p = 0.02) and ICAM-1 (1.40 vs. 1.01 RE, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dimethyl malonate reduces lung inflammation and capillary leak in ARDS. This may be mediated by protection of the EGX and inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and ICAM-1. Dimethyl malonate may be a novel therapeutic for ARDS.

Post VV-ECMO Weaning Hyperinflammation-Can Prophylactic Hemoadsorption Treatment Prevent Complications?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe clinical condition characterized by acute respiratory failure and a high mortality risk despite conventional mechanical ventilatory support. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) has emerged as an effective life-support technology for patients with ARDS. However, complications may arise following the decannulation of vvECMO, with a relatively frequent development of systemic hyperinflammation (SHI). Among the various treatment strategies for SHI, the use of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® has shown promising results in removing excessive levels of cytokines and attenuating the hyperinflammatory response. In this case series, we present three critically ill patients with ARDS secondary to pneumonia who underwent vvECMO and subsequently received prophylactic hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® following decannulation as a part of our clinical practice. This case series aims to describe the potential positive effects of hemoadsorption in preventing the development of SHI after vvECMO decannulation in ARDS patients.

Effects of intravenous sivelestat sodium on prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with sepsis: study protocol for a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is one of the most common risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Neutrophil elastase (NE) is believed to be an important mediator of ARDS. When sepsis occurs, a large number of inflammatory factors are activated and released, which makes neutrophils migrate into the lung, eventually leading to the occurrence of ARDS. Sivelestat sodium is an NE inhibitor that can inhibit the inflammatory reaction during systemic inflammatory response syndrome and alleviate lung injury. Therefore, we hypothesise that intravenous sivelestat sodium may prevent the occurrence of ARDS in patients with sepsis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, double-blind, adaptive, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial with an adaptive 'sample size re-estimation' design. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria who were transferred into the intensive care unit will be randomly assigned to receive sivelestat sodium or placebo for up to 7 days. The primary outcome is the development of ARDS within 7 days after randomisation. A total of 238 patients will be recruited based on a 15% decrease in the incidence of ARDS in the intervention group in this study. A predefined interim analysis will be performed to ensure that the calculation is reasonable after reaching 50% (120) of the planned sample size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of ZhongDa Hospital affiliated to Southeast University (identifier: Clinical Ethical Approval No. 2021ZDSYLL153-P03). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04973670.

Sulfasalazine prevents lung injury due to intra-abdominal sepsis in rats: possible role of Nrf2 and angiopoietin-2.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of sulfasalazine in preventing and treating intra-abdominal sepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a rat model. Forty male Wistar albino rats were used. The rats were randomly divided into four equal groups, and sepsis was induced in 30 rats by intraperitoneal administration of a fecal saline solution prepared from rat feces. Group 1: normal control (n=10) [non-surgical], Group 2: fecal intraperitoneal injection (FIP) (n=10) [untreated septic group], Group 3: FIP+saline (placebo) (n=10) [saline administered intraperitoneally], Group 4 (n=10): FIP+sulfasalazine [250 mg/kg per day administered intraperitoneally]. Computed tomography was performed and blood samples were collected for biochemical and blood gas analysis. The lungs were removed for histopathological studies. Statistically significant reductions in interleukin (IL)-6, IL1-ß, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, malondialdehyde (MDA), and angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2) levels were observed in the sulfasalazine group compared to the FIP+saline group (P<0.001). Nrf2 levels were significantly higher in the sulfasalazine-treated group than in the FIP and FIP+saline groups (P<0.01). Lung tissue scores were significantly reduced in the sulfasalazine group compared to the other sepsis groups. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value was significantly lower in the sulfasalazine group than in the FIP+saline group (P<0.001). PaO2 values were significantly higher in the sulfasalazine-treated group than in the FIP+saline-treated group (P<0.05). Sulfasalazine was shown to be effective in preventing and treating ARDS.

Pressure Injury Prevention in Patients in Prone Position With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, prone positioning improves oxygenation and reduces mortality. Pressure injuries occur frequently because of prolonged prone positioning in high-risk patients, and preventive measures are limited. This article describes 2 patients who developed minimal pressure injuries despite several prone positionings. Prevention strategies are also described. CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 64-year-old man and a 76-year-old woman were admitted to the hospital with respiratory insufficiency. Due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, both patients were intubated and received mechanical ventilation and prone positioning. DIAGNOSIS: Both patients had positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 and a diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Patient 1 was in prone position for 137 hours during 9 rounds of prone positioning; patient 2, for 99 hours during 6 rounds of prone positioning. The standardized pressure injury prevention bundle for prone positioning consisted of skin care, nipple protection with a multilayer foam dressing, a 2-part prone positioning set, and micropositioning maneuvers. For both patients, 2-cm-thick mixed-porosity polyurethane foam was added between skin and positioning set in the thoracic and pelvic areas and a polyurethane foam cushion was added under the head. OUTCOMES: Patient 1 developed no pressure injuries. Patient 2 developed category 2 pressure injuries on the chin and above the right eye during deviations from the protocol. CONCLUSION: For both patients, the additional application of polyurethane foam was effective for preventing pressure injuries. These case reports support the addition of polyurethane foam to prevent pressure injuries in patients placed in the prone position.

Lung Injury Is Induced by Abrupt Increase in Respiratory Rate but Prevented by Recruitment Maneuver in Mild Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Rats.

BACKGROUND: Gradually changing respiratory rate (RR) during time to reduce ventilation-induced lung injury has not been investigated. The authors hypothesized that gradual, compared with abrupt, increments in RR would mitigate ventilation-induced lung injury and that recruitment maneuver before abruptly increasing RR may prevent injurious biologic impact. METHODS: Twenty-four hours after intratracheal administration of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide, 49 male Wistar rats were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated (tidal volume, 6 ml/kg; positive end-expiratory pressure, 3 cm H2O) with RR increase patterns as follows (n = 7 per group): (1) control 1, RR = 70 breaths/min for 2 h; (2) and (3) abrupt increases of RR for 1 and 2 h, respectively, both for 2 h; (4) shorter RR adaptation, gradually increasing RR (from 70 to 130 breaths/min during 30 min); (5) longer RR adaptation, more gradual increase in RR (from 70 to 130 breaths/min during 60 min), both for 2 h; (6) control 2, abrupt increase of RR maintained for 1 h; and (7) control 3, recruitment maneuver (continuous positive airway pressure, 30 cm H2O for 30 s) followed by control-2 protocol. RESULTS: At the end of 1 h of mechanical ventilation, cumulative diffuse alveolar damage scores were lower in shorter (11.0 [8.0 to 12.0]) and longer (13.0 [11.0 to 14.0]) RR adaptation groups than in animals with abrupt increase of RR for 1 h (25.0 [22.0 to 26.0], P = 0.035 and P = 0.048, respectively) and 2 h (35.0 [32.0 to 39.0], P = 0.003 and P = 0.040, respectively); mechanical power and lung heterogeneity were lower, and alveolar integrity was higher, in the longer RR adaptation group compared with abruptly adjusted groups; markers of lung inflammation (interleukin-6), epithelial (club cell secretory protein [CC-16]) and endothelial cell damage (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM-1]) were higher in both abrupt groups, but not in either RR adaptation group, compared with controls. Recruitment maneuver prevented the increase in VCAM-1 and CC-16 gene expressions in the abruptly increased RR groups. CONCLUSIONS: In mild experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome in rats, gradually increasing RR, compared with abruptly doing so, can mitigate the development of ventilation-induced lung injury. In addition, recruitment maneuver prevented the injurious biologic impact of abrupt increases in RR.

D-tagatose protects against oleic acid-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in rats by activating PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier, resulting in severe alveolar edema and inflammation. D-tagatose (TAG) is a low-calorie fructose isomer with diverse biological activities whose role in ARDS has never been explored. We found that TAG protects lung tissues from injury in the oleic acid-induced rat model of ARDS. Seventeen male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Sham (n = 5), ARDS (n = 6), and TAG + ARDS (n = 6). The treatment groups were injected with oleic acid to induce ARDS, and the TAG + ARDS group was given TAG 3 days before the induction. After the treatments, the effect of TAG was evaluated by blood gas analysis and observing the gross and histological structure of the lung. The results showed that TAG significantly improved the oxygenation function, reduced the respiratory acidosis and the inflammatory response. TAG also improved the vascular permeability in ARDS rats and promoted the differentiation of alveolar type II cells, maintaining the stability of the alveolar structure. This protective effect of TAG on the lung may be achieved by activating the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway. Thus, TAG protects against oleic acid-induced ARDS in rats, suggesting a new clinical strategy for treating the condition.

Oral IRAK4 inhibitor BAY-1834845 prevents acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a lethal clinical entity that has become an emergency event with the outbreak of COVID-19. However, to date, there are no well-proven pharmacotherapies except dexamethasone. This study is aimed to evaluate IRAK4 inhibitors as a potential treatment for ARDS-cytokine release syndrome (CRS). We applied two IRAK4 inhibitors, BAY-1834845 and PF-06650833 to an inhaled lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ARDS mouse model with control of high dose dexamethasone (10 mg/kg). Unexpectedly, although both compounds had excellent IC50 on IRAK4 kinase activity, only BAY-1834845 but not PF-06650833 or high dose dexamethasone could significantly prevent lung injury according to a blinded pathology scoring. Further, only BAY-1834845 and BAY-1834845 combined with dexamethasone could effectively improve the injury score of pre-existed ARDS. Compared with PF-06650833 and high dose dexamethasone, BAY-1834845 remarkably decreased inflammatory cells infiltrating lung tissue and neutrophil count in BALF. BAY-1834845, DEX, and the combination of the two agents could decrease BALF total T cells, monocyte, and macrophages. In further cell type enrichment analysis based on lung tissue RNA-seq, both BAY-1834845 and dexamethasone decreased signatures of inflammatory cells and effector lymphocytes. Interestingly, unlike the dexamethasone group, BAY-1834845 largely preserved the signatures of naïve lymphocytes and stromal cells such as endothelial cells, chondrocytes, and smooth muscle cells. Differential gene enrichment suggested that BAY-1834845 downregulated genes more efficiently than dexamethasone, especially TNF, IL-17, interferon, and Toll-like receptor signaling.

Mechanism of COVID-19 Causing ARDS: Exploring the Possibility of Preventing and Treating SARS-CoV-2.

Novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) is spreading worldwide, causing great harm and stress to humans. Since patients with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) have a high probability of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in severe cases, the pathways through which SARS-CoV-2 causes lung injury have become a major concern in the scientific field. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and lung injury and explore the possible mechanisms of COVID-19 in ARDS from the perspectives of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protein, cytokine storm, activation of the immune response, triggering of Fas/FasL signaling pathway to promote apoptosis, JAK/STAT pathway, NF-κB pathway, type I interferon, vitamin D, and explore the possibility of prevention and treatment of COVID-19. To explore the possibility of SARS-CoV-2, and to provide new ideas to stop the development of ARDS in COVID-19 patients.

Vaccine using community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome toxin as an antigen against Mycoplasma pneumoniae in mice.

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp) is one of the most common causes of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in humans. Because of the frequent epidemics and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant Mp, vaccines for Mp are urgently needed to ameliorate the pneumonia and secondary complications. The community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) toxin produced by Mp is a pathogenic factor that induces severe inflammatory responses in lung. Although blocking CARDS toxin is expected to mitigate the severity of Mp pneumonia, the potential of CARDS toxin as a vaccine antigen has not been assessed. Here, we examined the effectiveness of vaccine using recombinant CARDS toxin (rCARDS toxin) as an antigen in mice. Immunization with rCARDS toxin induced both rCARDS toxin- and Mp-specific antibody responses, indicating that CARDS toxin is located on the surface of Mp. In addition, immunization with rCARDS toxin decreased not only lung injury, neutrophil infiltration, and the production of inflammatory cytokines but also the persistence of Mp in lung after Mp challenge. Furthermore, we elucidated that the CARDS toxin on the surface of Mp facilitates the adherence of Mp to epithelial cells. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the potential of rCARDS toxin as a vaccine antigen to ameliorate Mp pneumonia by suppressing the inflammatory responses induced by Mp and the persistence of Mp in lung. These data support the development of novel vaccines for Mp pneumonia.

Strategies to minimize heterogeneity and optimize clinical trials in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): Insights from mathematical modelling.

BACKGROUND: Mathematical modelling may aid in understanding the complex interactions between injury and immune response in critical illness. METHODS: We utilize a system biology model of COVID-19 to analyze the effect of altering baseline patient characteristics on the outcome of immunomodulatory therapies. We create example parameter sets meant to mimic diverse patient types. For each patient type, we define the optimal treatment, identify biologic programs responsible for clinical responses, and predict biomarkers of those programs. FINDINGS: Model states representing older and hyperinflamed patients respond better to immunomodulation than those representing obese and diabetic patients. The disparate clinical responses are driven by distinct biologic programs. Optimal treatment initiation time is determined by neutrophil recruitment, systemic cytokine expression, systemic microthrombosis and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in older patients, and by RAS, systemic microthrombosis and trans IL6 signalling for hyperinflamed patients. For older and hyperinflamed patients, IL6 modulating therapy is predicted to be optimal when initiated very early (<4th day of infection) and broad immunosuppression therapy (corticosteroids) is predicted to be optimally initiated later in the disease (7th - 9th day of infection). We show that markers of biologic programs identified by the model correspond to clinically identified markers of disease severity. INTERPRETATION: We demonstrate that modelling of COVID-19 pathobiology can suggest biomarkers that predict optimal response to a given immunomodulatory treatment. Mathematical modelling thus constitutes a novel adjunct to predictive enrichment and may aid in the reduction of heterogeneity in critical care trials. FUNDING: C.V. received a Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions Individual Fellowship (MSCA-IF-GF-2020-101028945). R.K.J.'s research is supported by R01-CA208205, and U01-CA 224348, R35-CA197743 and grants from the National Foundation for Cancer Research, Jane's Trust Foundation, Advanced Medical Research Foundation and Harvard Ludwig Cancer Center. No funder had a role in production or approval of this manuscript.

COVID-19 and ARDS: Update on Preventive and Therapeutic Venues.

A novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which initially originated in China, has outstretched to all nations and turned out to be an intense global concern for both the governments and the public. In addition to the health concerns, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a tremendous impact on the economic and political conditions of every nation. Ever since the start of the pandemic, the physicians were constrained to rely on the management strategies due to a lack of clear understanding of the disease pathogenesis caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Scientists are working tirelessly to gather maximum information about the deadly virus and come up with various strategies, which can be used against COVID-19 infection in terms of therapeutics and vaccine development. It is quite evident that the virus infection leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and most of the deaths occur due to respiratory failure. As the virus spreads through respiratory droplets, the strenuous exercise of preventive measures and diagnosis at a large scale has been in practice across the globe to prevent transmission. This review amalgamates the various updates and acts as an umbrella to provide insights on SARS-CoV-2 mediated ARDS pathogenesis, the impact of co-morbidities, diagnostics, current progress in vaccine development, and promising therapeutics and immuno-modulatory strategies, highlighting various concerns and gaps that need to be addressed to fight current and future pandemics effectively.